Race -- as a question of black and white -- is less prominent in 2004 than it has been in any presidential election year since 1944, when the country was at war and most black people were still disenfranchised. Is this because America's racial justice issues are all settled? Has the legacy of slavery been repaired? Have all vestiges of white supremacy been rooted out of the culture?
No way. But "race" talk has receded in importance nonetheless, and this has happened for at least three reasons: First, in 2004 there is no single, clearly defined racial issue upon which the presidential candidates are in dispute. Second, the personal backgrounds of the candidates serve to mute racial passions. And finally, demographic change has diffused, and confused, the politics of race. [...]
| Continue Danny Duncan Collum's Sojourners Magazine article Color Lines and Party Lines: Race and politics in 2004."
posted in articles on July 14, 2004 1:27 AM | t (0)
« Previous phile: And never, ever test the Wrath of Lashunda.
» Next phile: Of course, no one in his or her right mind would hand your uncle a bullhorn.
Return to top of page